Update for those who were ripped off by Canadian Lenders Association?
Q. I had called Phone Busters about a month ago and just got a call from the Toronto Police that my money order had been intercepted by them (along with others) that hadn't been cashed yet. They are investigating these guys and apparently this company was being investigated under a different name back in August. The police warned me that they will keep doing it until they are caught. So there may be hope for some of us who lost alot of money. Please reply if you have heard any other updates and good luck to you in getting your money back.
Asked by KJ - Thu Jan 4 12:39:41 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I was ripped off by this company too. I lost $1000. Do I have to provide the details to the Toronto Police along with a copy of my money order? I wanted to e-mail you but you do not allow e-mails so please e-mail me instead. malgosia33@rogers.com. Thanks. Margaret
Answered by Malgosias - Fri Jan 5 21:46:06 2007
Q. I had called Phone Busters about a month ago and just got a call from the Toronto Police that my money order had been intercepted by them (along with others) that hadn't been cashed yet. They are investigating these guys and apparently this company was being investigated under a different name back in August. The police warned me that they will keep doing it until they are caught. So there may be hope for some of us who lost alot of money. Please reply if you have heard any other updates and good luck to you in getting your money back.
Asked by KJ - Thu Jan 4 12:39:41 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I was ripped off by this company too. I lost $1000. Do I have to provide the details to the Toronto Police along with a copy of my money order? I wanted to e-mail you but you do not allow e-mails so please e-mail me instead. malgosia33@rogers.com. Thanks. Margaret
Answered by Malgosias - Fri Jan 5 21:46:06 2007
What is the summary of this text?
Q. I don't speak in english very well so i would like a summary of this text toronto - Young drivers in Ontario bristled yesterday at a proposed law that would usher in some of the toughest restrictions in the country, including barring new motorists 19 and under from driving with more than one of their teenage friends at a time. While Premier Dalton McGuinty called the legislation a "modest restriction'' on the freedoms of young people and safe-driving advocates lauded the move, it raised the ire of many youth. Thousands of them took to Facebook to air their grievances online. Concerns about the environmental effects of no longer carpooling, and questions about just how designated drivers would get their friends home, abounded. At a… [cont.]
Asked by Vanessaa* - Wed Nov 19 15:26:22 2008 - - 1 Answers - 1 Comments
A. A bill was sent to the Ontario legislature (law-making body of government) to restrict teenage drivers 19 and under to having one passenger aged 19 and under in the same car. Also to restrict drivers 21 and under to no alcohol (zero tolerance). Most of the text is about arguing points pro and con. BTW, Great typing skills!
Answered by -PapaJohn- - Wed Nov 19 18:18:55 2008
Q. I don't speak in english very well so i would like a summary of this text toronto - Young drivers in Ontario bristled yesterday at a proposed law that would usher in some of the toughest restrictions in the country, including barring new motorists 19 and under from driving with more than one of their teenage friends at a time. While Premier Dalton McGuinty called the legislation a "modest restriction'' on the freedoms of young people and safe-driving advocates lauded the move, it raised the ire of many youth. Thousands of them took to Facebook to air their grievances online. Concerns about the environmental effects of no longer carpooling, and questions about just how designated drivers would get their friends home, abounded. At a… [cont.]
Asked by Vanessaa* - Wed Nov 19 15:26:22 2008 - - 1 Answers - 1 Comments
A. A bill was sent to the Ontario legislature (law-making body of government) to restrict teenage drivers 19 and under to having one passenger aged 19 and under in the same car. Also to restrict drivers 21 and under to no alcohol (zero tolerance). Most of the text is about arguing points pro and con. BTW, Great typing skills!
Answered by -PapaJohn- - Wed Nov 19 18:18:55 2008
New type of Defense for Rape?
Q. It wasn't a sexual assault -- it was sleep sex. In an unusual case in a Scarborough, Ontario, courtroom, Jan Luedecke was acquitted of sexual assault after a judge ruled he was asleep during the attack -- a disorder known as "sexsomnia." "This is indeed a rare case ... His conduct was not voluntary," said Justice Russell Otter, as Luedecke's victim shook, sobbed and then left the courtroom. The judgment has outraged women's groups. "This is infuriating. It's another case of the courts not taking a woman seriously, adding yet another list to the list of excuses which men use for sexual assault," said Suzanne Jay, of the Canadian Association of Sexual Assault Centers. Luedecke, a 33-year-old landscaper, met his victim at a party on… [cont.]
Asked by Raymond Pistachio - Fri Oct 3 19:45:49 2008 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. doesn't sound right..
Answered by Jilly R - Fri Oct 10 08:39:27 2008
Q. It wasn't a sexual assault -- it was sleep sex. In an unusual case in a Scarborough, Ontario, courtroom, Jan Luedecke was acquitted of sexual assault after a judge ruled he was asleep during the attack -- a disorder known as "sexsomnia." "This is indeed a rare case ... His conduct was not voluntary," said Justice Russell Otter, as Luedecke's victim shook, sobbed and then left the courtroom. The judgment has outraged women's groups. "This is infuriating. It's another case of the courts not taking a woman seriously, adding yet another list to the list of excuses which men use for sexual assault," said Suzanne Jay, of the Canadian Association of Sexual Assault Centers. Luedecke, a 33-year-old landscaper, met his victim at a party on… [cont.]
Asked by Raymond Pistachio - Fri Oct 3 19:45:49 2008 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. doesn't sound right..
Answered by Jilly R - Fri Oct 10 08:39:27 2008
Twenty-eight percent of Canadians admit knowingly buying counterfeit goods?
Q. TORONTO (Reuters) - Twenty-eight percent of Canadians admit knowingly buying counterfeit goods such as knockoff clothes, watches, purses and movies, according to a survey released on Tuesday. The survey, conducted by polling firm and also found that 12 percent of respondents found out later that a product they bought was a knockoff. "The combined figure is slightly more than triple the proportion found in the United States by (polling firm) Gallup," the CACN said in a statement. "There, just 13 percent of Americans purchased, copied or downloaded imitation or counterfeit products." The CACN represents companies and industry associations fighting product counterfeiting and copyright piracy in Canada and abroad. Its members include… [cont.]
Asked by Eluxurybay.com - Fri Mar 16 10:54:37 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Canada rules.
Answered by Diana - Fri Mar 16 10:59:26 2007
Q. TORONTO (Reuters) - Twenty-eight percent of Canadians admit knowingly buying counterfeit goods such as knockoff clothes, watches, purses and movies, according to a survey released on Tuesday. The survey, conducted by polling firm and also found that 12 percent of respondents found out later that a product they bought was a knockoff. "The combined figure is slightly more than triple the proportion found in the United States by (polling firm) Gallup," the CACN said in a statement. "There, just 13 percent of Americans purchased, copied or downloaded imitation or counterfeit products." The CACN represents companies and industry associations fighting product counterfeiting and copyright piracy in Canada and abroad. Its members include… [cont.]
Asked by Eluxurybay.com - Fri Mar 16 10:54:37 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Canada rules.
Answered by Diana - Fri Mar 16 10:59:26 2007
What do you think about this article?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Tue Aug 18 15:58:08 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The author erects "profit" as the evil destroyer and "public-controlled" as the benevolent bringer of loving care. That's the fundamental flaw in this article. The fact is though, that whether or not profit is involved, and whether or not the system is nationalized are irrelevant to whether or not health care is effective. The primary issue is choice. The easier it is to say, "I don't like my health care, so I'm going to find another source which provides it.", the better health care will be. Fundamentally, the public option for health care will actually lead to a narrowing of options and alternatives. This is because there is only one government that will be providing it. Also, EVIL "profit" will be replaced by politics when the… [cont.]
Answered by M O R P H E U S - Thu Aug 20 04:43:27 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Tue Aug 18 15:58:08 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The author erects "profit" as the evil destroyer and "public-controlled" as the benevolent bringer of loving care. That's the fundamental flaw in this article. The fact is though, that whether or not profit is involved, and whether or not the system is nationalized are irrelevant to whether or not health care is effective. The primary issue is choice. The easier it is to say, "I don't like my health care, so I'm going to find another source which provides it.", the better health care will be. Fundamentally, the public option for health care will actually lead to a narrowing of options and alternatives. This is because there is only one government that will be providing it. Also, EVIL "profit" will be replaced by politics when the… [cont.]
Answered by M O R P H E U S - Thu Aug 20 04:43:27 2009
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by John Gfdgfdgfd - Fri Aug 7 14:50:22 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I agree. Not only do health costs tend to prevent proper treatment, emergency treatments often sink families. When the budget jumps up a thousand dollars extra a month (or more) most people can't manage it for more than a year. When you aren't throwing insurance and money around doctors don't try as hard. I've seen it between insured jobs as I sought a surgical way off medication. Also, hospitals play the hidden cost game. Why should a doctor bill you separately from the hospital he treats you in? And anesthesia? Not to mention the billing usually ends up with some kind of collection cost acting like an interest rate. We can do better than feeding the greedy. Look at what that did to Wall Street.
Answered by Robert H - Fri Aug 7 16:21:42 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by John Gfdgfdgfd - Fri Aug 7 14:50:22 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I agree. Not only do health costs tend to prevent proper treatment, emergency treatments often sink families. When the budget jumps up a thousand dollars extra a month (or more) most people can't manage it for more than a year. When you aren't throwing insurance and money around doctors don't try as hard. I've seen it between insured jobs as I sought a surgical way off medication. Also, hospitals play the hidden cost game. Why should a doctor bill you separately from the hospital he treats you in? And anesthesia? Not to mention the billing usually ends up with some kind of collection cost acting like an interest rate. We can do better than feeding the greedy. Look at what that did to Wall Street.
Answered by Robert H - Fri Aug 7 16:21:42 2009
Please read this article and argue your side. I have no opinion. Please help to clarify this confusing matter!?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 10:32:44 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There are many points here that can be argued; I'm at work or I'd go into some of them more. Sure, health insurance is in it to make money. Why would any fool start a company and not make money? The problem with government being in the business is that they can't efficiently and accurately run what programs they have in place now. Waste is rampant. IT seems to be 20 years behind any good company. The US Government way of doing business would make any corporate CEO scream and yell. Topping the whole list is the 'middle class' fallacy. You either have money or you don't. America needs to change many things, and those changes are gonna happen. And yes, you'll see the gap widen between the have and the have-nots. The US has far… [cont.]
Answered by John N - Fri Aug 7 11:26:07 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 10:32:44 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There are many points here that can be argued; I'm at work or I'd go into some of them more. Sure, health insurance is in it to make money. Why would any fool start a company and not make money? The problem with government being in the business is that they can't efficiently and accurately run what programs they have in place now. Waste is rampant. IT seems to be 20 years behind any good company. The US Government way of doing business would make any corporate CEO scream and yell. Topping the whole list is the 'middle class' fallacy. You either have money or you don't. America needs to change many things, and those changes are gonna happen. And yes, you'll see the gap widen between the have and the have-nots. The US has far… [cont.]
Answered by John N - Fri Aug 7 11:26:07 2009
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:21:52 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Agree. There's also no profit for the military.
Answered by Ricky - Fri Aug 7 18:27:15 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:21:52 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Agree. There's also no profit for the military.
Answered by Ricky - Fri Aug 7 18:27:15 2009
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:20:43 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. No he doesn't...He is a Socialist Shill. A capitalist hater. Why in the world would someone invest 12 years of college to earn $80,000 a year? Also, does The O'Bama guarantee that a doctor won't get sued? Will a doctor no longer have to pay malpractice insurance? Democracy may not survive as this Educated imbecile is clamoring, But I guarantee you a Republican form of government (the form of government in the US, NOT a Democracy) HAS to have a gap between the rich and the poor or the poor will have NO incentive to better their situation. Also by removing wealth from the one who earns it and gives it to those who don't provides an incentive to do one of two things. STOP making money or go make it where it is NOT taken away from you...Since [cont.]
Answered by NAnZI pELOZI's Forced Social - Fri Aug 7 22:51:06 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:20:43 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. No he doesn't...He is a Socialist Shill. A capitalist hater. Why in the world would someone invest 12 years of college to earn $80,000 a year? Also, does The O'Bama guarantee that a doctor won't get sued? Will a doctor no longer have to pay malpractice insurance? Democracy may not survive as this Educated imbecile is clamoring, But I guarantee you a Republican form of government (the form of government in the US, NOT a Democracy) HAS to have a gap between the rich and the poor or the poor will have NO incentive to better their situation. Also by removing wealth from the one who earns it and gives it to those who don't provides an incentive to do one of two things. STOP making money or go make it where it is NOT taken away from you...Since [cont.]
Answered by NAnZI pELOZI's Forced Social - Fri Aug 7 22:51:06 2009
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:22:39 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Very easy: he's wrong. People like this embrace but never admit to their desire to see confiscatory redistribution of all income in this country. This is just his wet dream to nationalize 15% of the economy.
Answered by Giggles Q. McGee - Fri Aug 7 18:32:38 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:22:39 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Very easy: he's wrong. People like this embrace but never admit to their desire to see confiscatory redistribution of all income in this country. This is just his wet dream to nationalize 15% of the economy.
Answered by Giggles Q. McGee - Fri Aug 7 18:32:38 2009
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right?
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:30:20 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. No he doesn't. For one thing there are plenty of other and better ways to measure the quality of health care than the way the WHO does it. One of those ways is to look at the outcome of people who do get sick. If you look at that data the conclusion is inescapable you've got a better chance of surviving in America than anywhere else. Does that mean we have the best health care, maybe but for sure it means that maybe those other programs are as good as claimed. The profit motive makes the consumer the king. Its why the cost of items that are produced in the free market go down and it forces manufacturers and distributors to meet consumer needs. Many grocery stores and gas stations are open 24 hrs a day, yet the post office is… [cont.]
Answered by Roadkill - Fri Aug 7 20:18:31 2009
Q. For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to industry lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined evil as resulting from indecision. Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of… [cont.]
Asked by unknown - Fri Aug 7 18:30:20 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. No he doesn't. For one thing there are plenty of other and better ways to measure the quality of health care than the way the WHO does it. One of those ways is to look at the outcome of people who do get sick. If you look at that data the conclusion is inescapable you've got a better chance of surviving in America than anywhere else. Does that mean we have the best health care, maybe but for sure it means that maybe those other programs are as good as claimed. The profit motive makes the consumer the king. Its why the cost of items that are produced in the free market go down and it forces manufacturers and distributors to meet consumer needs. Many grocery stores and gas stations are open 24 hrs a day, yet the post office is… [cont.]
Answered by Roadkill - Fri Aug 7 20:18:31 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'Canadian Police Association'
Fri Jul 30 04:34:25 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
yourottawaregion.com
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:38:58 GMT+00:00
Your Ottawa Region His current memberships include the Ontario Provincial Police Association and the Ontario Provincial Police Veterans Association . ...
zend.com
100px x 183px | 4.50kB
[source page]
July 26 2000 By Andrew Coldham PHP In the Name of the Law Who in the world collects police badges Members of Canadian Police Insignia Collectors Association
rafaelgomez.com
Rafael
ue, 11 May 2010 17:05:53 GM
Their support of the registry was joined by the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP), The Canadian Association of Police Boards (CAPB), and the . Canadian Police Association. (CPA). On May 5th, the CACP, CAPB, and CPA issues a ...
[Hide]▲
